The Paperclip Alternative That's Managed and Ready to Scale
Paperclip is an open-source, self-hosted orchestration system that frames AI agents as employees in a virtual company. Orqestr is a managed platform that gives you multi-agent orchestration, 3,000+ integrations, approval workflows, and cost controls, without running your own infrastructure.
No credit card required · Free plan included
The Gap: Self-Hosted Framework vs Managed Platform
Paperclip gives you an org-chart metaphor and heartbeat-based scheduling, but you self-host everything, manage your own database, wire up your own agents, and track costs manually. For teams that want production-grade agent orchestration without DevOps, the gap is infrastructure, integrations, and operational maturity.
Platform Comparison
Paperclip
- Self-hosted, requires your own server, database, and maintenance
- No managed integrations. Bring-your-own agents and tools
- Hierarchical org-chart model with heartbeat scheduling
- Board-level governance but no artifact-based approval system
- Per-agent budgets but manual cost tracking
- Multi-company support but single-user operation
- Heartbeat-based scheduling, no event triggers or webhooks
Orqestr
- Fully managed cloud, zero infrastructure setup
- 3,000+ managed integrations via MCP and connectors
- Built-in orchestrator with automatic task decomposition
- Native approval workflows with artifact review
- Per-model cost tracking with spending caps and BYOK
- Multi-user workspaces with roles and projects
- Event triggers, webhooks, and cron schedules
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Orqestr | Paperclip |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Fully managed cloud | Self-hosted (local or VPS) |
| Setup | Visual builder, zero-config | CLI onboarding + config |
| Integrations | 3,000+ managed | Bring-your-own agents |
| Task orchestration | Goal-driven with dependencies | Org-chart hierarchy |
| Scheduling | Cron, one-time & event triggers | Heartbeat intervals |
| Human approval | Native approval flows | Board governance model |
| Cost tracking | Built-in per-model billing | Per-agent budgets |
| Knowledge system | Project & task artifacts | SKILLS.md files |
| Team features | Multi-user workspaces | Single-user operation |
| Agent runtimes | Managed with model selection | Any runtime via adapters |
Why Teams Choose Orqestr
Zero infrastructure
Sign up and start running agent workflows. No servers, no databases, no Docker, no CLI setup.
3,000+ managed integrations
Connect agents to Slack, GitHub, Notion, and thousands more via MCP and managed connectors, no custom wiring.
Goal-driven orchestration
Describe what you want done. The orchestrator decomposes, assigns, and sequences work across agents.
Built-in approvals
Review agent outputs, request changes, and approve artifacts before anything goes live.
Built-in billing & cost controls
Per-model cost breakdowns, spending caps, usage alerts, and optional BYOK, all managed for you.
Multi-user workspaces
Shared workspaces with roles, projects, and organization-wide agent management, not single-user.
When to Choose Orqestr vs Paperclip
Choose Orqestr if you:
- Want managed cloud without self-hosting infrastructure
- Need 3,000+ integrations that work out of the box
- Want approval workflows with artifact review
- Need multi-user workspaces with team collaboration
- Want built-in cost tracking and spending controls
- Prefer goal-driven orchestration over org-chart hierarchies
Choose Paperclip if you:
- Want to self-host everything with full source code control
- Prefer the company/org-chart metaphor for agent management
- Need multi-company isolation in a single deployment
- Want to bring any agent runtime (Cursor, Claude Code, etc.)
Common Questions
Is Paperclip free?+
Can Orqestr use any agent runtime like Paperclip?+
Does Orqestr support the company/org-chart model?+
How does Orqestr handle multi-company needs?+
Related Comparisons
Ready to build your AI agent team?
Start with the free plan. No credit card required. See why teams choose Orqestr over Paperclip.